HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.25.3Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 9 285K

The Core i3-3210 is much slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $380.00 cheaper!

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

$159.00View CPUAll CPUs

CPU

$539.00View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 291% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 12 years newer
Available for $539.00

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Counter-Strike 22023

Core i3-3210

364FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

769FPS

Dota 22013

Core i3-3210

169FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

322FPS

League of Legends2009

Core i3-3210

122FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

438FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Core i3-3210

185FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

226FPS

Escape From Tarkov2017

Core i3-3210

208FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

269FPS

Valorant2020

Core i3-3210

539FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

822FPS

Minecraft2011

Core i3-3210

575FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

860FPS

Fortnite2017

Core i3-3210

329FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

316FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core i3-3210

Core Ultra 9 285K

74%

Core Ultra 9 285K ranks 70 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core i3-3210

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 22 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core i3-3210

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 20 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core i3-3210

3 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K

36 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K has 33 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core i3-3210

3.2 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K

3.7 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K has a 16% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core i3-3210

Core Ultra 9 285K

5.7 GHz

TDPhelp

Core i3-3210

55W

Core Ultra 9 285K

125W

Core i3-3210 draws 70W less power.

Pricehelp

Core i3-3210

$159.00

Core Ultra 9 285K

$539.00

Core i3-3210 is $380.00 cheaper.

Core i3-3210Core Ultra 9 285K

LGA1155

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Ivy Bridge

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Desktop

Intel HD 2500

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

DDR3

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core i3-3210 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 1750% faster than the Core i3-3210 on average across 100+ games, scoring 74/100 vs 4/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Core i3-3210?expand_more

1750% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core i3-3210 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 74/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core i3-3210 and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

Performance: Core i3-3210 scores 4/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 74/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core i3-3210 or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core i3-3210 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 74/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.