Dota 2
1080p@240Hz·25:19 played
CatalinVladu·4h ago
Public4 Tips
35
FPSAverage
25
FPS1% Low
14%/52°C
99%/82°C
16 GB
86%usage
Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core i5-13400F is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $304.41 cheaper!
Core i5-13400F54% Score
- Up to 201% cheaper – $234.59 vs $539.00
- Up to 133% better value for money
Core Ultra 9 285K75% Score
- Up to 29% faster on average across 100+ games
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
- Up to 201% more expensive – $539.00 vs $234.59
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K has a 48% higher base clock.
Turbo Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 24% higher.
LGA1700
Sockethelp
LGA1851Raptor Lake-S
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-SDesktop
Segmenthelp
DesktopNo Integrated Graphics
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5)
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core i5-13400F or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 39% faster than the Core i5-13400F on average across 100+ games, scoring 75/100 vs 54/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Core i5-13400F?expand_more
39% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core i5-13400F or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 75/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
Performance: Core i5-13400F scores 54/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 75/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Core i5-13400F or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core i5-13400F or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 75/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 7800X3Di5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 9700Xi5-13400F vs Ryzen 9 9900Xi5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 7700Xi5-13400F vs Ultra 7 265KFi5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 5500i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 9850X3Di5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 7600Xi5-13400F vs Ultra 5 245Ki5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 8500Gi5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 4500i5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 7500X3Di5-13400F vs i3-6100i5-13400F vs Ultra 5 225i5-13400F vs i5-4690i5-13400F vs i5-4670i5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 3500Xi5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 7500Fi5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 5600Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 7 265KFUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 5500Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 5 245KUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 4500Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DUltra 9 285K vs i3-6100Ultra 9 285K vs Ultra 5 225Ultra 9 285K vs i5-4690Ultra 9 285K vs i5-4670Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 3500XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7500FUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 5600